tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4425732352511468694.post8747080552210592720..comments2023-08-20T04:55:39.436-07:00Comments on Ars Psychiatrica: The Theory of Multiple IntelligencesNovalishttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10501890494890617030noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4425732352511468694.post-5252687429556152422009-09-26T09:38:52.696-07:002009-09-26T09:38:52.696-07:00Well, I talk as much as I write, and get myself in...Well, I talk as much as I write, and get myself into a lot of trouble with both.....:) <br><br>I'm absolutely atrocious at debate, or legal type argument or any conversations with hostile/arrogant types and become a turtle and pull into my shell. But am fine at public speaking and preaching, despite being shy one on one.Retrieverhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09036341287285545932noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4425732352511468694.post-12548769559979424282009-09-27T04:00:37.368-07:002009-09-27T04:00:37.368-07:00Speaking for me is a verbally mechanical process w...Speaking for me is a verbally mechanical process where thoughts are linearly transmuted into words; whereas writing is more of a translation of image-based thought animations: thoughts come to me as pictorial representations and writing is the secondary process of verbalising those images.<br><br>Speaking is like fruit picking and basketing the ideas into coherent sentences; writing is more like painting with words, the colours sloshing against each other cohering into their own sense of logic.<br><br>Writing also seems to have the ability to better access, integrate, and connect wildly disparate thoughts/ideas than speaking does.<br><br>And the actual act of writing seems to be self-perpetuating, fueling its own momementum and materialising concepts unknowable were it not for the writing itself.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com